Star Trek had a Next Generation as far back as the 1980s. It seems more recent, somehow.
The US Federal Aviation Administration then coined the phrase to launch the Next Generation Air Transportation System in 2007, an ambitious program to modernise US skies by 2030 that set goals for safety, efficiency, capacity, access, flexibility, predictability, resilience and environmental impact.
Since then, it is probably with environmental impact that ‘NextGen’ has become most associated, as anything that improves fuel efficiency has been labelled 'NextGen' as we look forward to a future of reduced fuel burn, emissions and cost of flying.
NextGen's biggest achievement is reducing total fuel burn by 40 percent since 1960, but
improving fuel efficiency is no longer commercial aviation's biggest goal.
Emissions have doubled since 1990 as passenger numbers accelerate, and focus has now switched from reducing them to eliminating them altogether.
So it's no surprise to note that ‘NextGen’ is out of fashion and ‘New Generation’ or ‘Latest Generation’ are more preferred these days.
In 2024, an estimated 30 percent of the global fleet was 'Latest Generation', with many more set to convert by 2043.
But is it really accurate to include the progression from 'Previous Generation' to 'Latest Generation' as part of aviation’s decarbonisation journey to net-zero emissions by 2050, or is it just the steady continuation of the last 65 years of fuel efficiency improvements?
To fulfil the journey to net-zero emissions, aviation will need ‘Future Aircraft’, not ‘Latest Generation’ or ‘New Generation’.
More fixed on the elimination of emissions than the reduction, it will mostly use technology that hasn’t been invented yet.
So what are ‘Future Aircraft’? According to Airbus, they are “a new generation of low-emission aircraft built with lightweight, durable and sustainably-sourced materials such as advanced composites, bio-fibres and bio-sourced resins”.
Integral to ‘Future Aircraft’ are three key components:
Commercial aviation is innovating fast to realise net-zero emissions by 2050.
Here are a selection of some of those innovations:
Certainly, aviation is excited by the prospect of ‘Future Aircraft’, according to an early 2025 global survey co-authored by Bank of America (BofA) and Aviation Week, which questioned 492 respondents (including lessors, manufacturers, component suppliers and MROs), of which 45 percent were airlines.
Some 85 percent of airlines (and 78 percent of total respondents) agreed that a 'Future Aircraft' engine would be “compelling to purchase”.
The majority said they would be willing to consider unusual designs if the engine technology was in place.
You've probably known for a while not to use the term 'NextGen', but is it time commercial aviation stopped thinking in terms of generations altogether and instead switched its focus entirely towards the future? A generation-by-generation approach to cutting emissions, remembering how much worse it was in the 1960s or 1990s (or how much better it was in 2020), is not going to get the industry any closer to its goal: net zero emissions for all commercial aviation by 2050. Make no mistake, this is a generational challenge that will greatly affect future generations. We can't afford any distractions from our focus on the future.